ITC 2020 40k Missions in their Final Form!

So here we are! Barring any grammar or clarity issues, or any egregious balance issues, the missions are now done.

Read the missions, here.

Changes have been written in magenta for convenience.

Thanks to everyone for contributing to these new ITC 40k 2020 season missions! This represents a community effort and reflects the desires of the ITC community of 40k enthusiasts. The continued evolution of these missions will hopefully give us a more balanced and enjoyable matched play experience. And of course, as we always say, you can use any missions you like in the ITC so if your community wants to mix it up, or really loves the Chapter Approved 2019 mission set, or whatever the case may be, feel free to do so and still count points to the ITC.

Enjoy and leave any comments or critiques in the comments section below!

And remember, Frontline Gaming sells gaming products at a discount, every day in their webcart!

secondhandhsop

Tags:

About Reecius

The fearless leader of the intrepid group of gamers gone retailers at Frontline Gaming!

22 Responses to “ITC 2020 40k Missions in their Final Form!”

  1. Ryan February 27, 2020 1:15 pm #

    For king of the hill and imperial knights. 1 Knight scores the single point, but they cannot get the double point on turn 2 plus? Or should it read two Knights on the center scores two points? I think it should.

    • Reecius
      Reecius February 27, 2020 1:32 pm #

      It reads: a combination of two units, a Knight being one of them. So, you need two knights, or a knight and a multi-model units, etc.

  2. george February 27, 2020 3:54 pm #

    woooo! changes in magenta 😀

  3. Gabe February 27, 2020 4:34 pm #

    Are war dogs considered Chaos knights for the Postman?

    • Saieden February 27, 2020 7:52 pm #

      The exception only applies to titanic.

      • abusepuppy February 27, 2020 11:58 pm #

        It doesn’t say that in the document, it simply says “Imperial Knights and Chaos Knights,” and War Dogs/Armigers certainly are part of those factions.

  4. Saieden February 27, 2020 9:10 pm #

    The Marked for death change is gonna lead to a significant point increase in Night Spinners (calling it). On the other hand, it gives me a reason to take Starcannons on wraithlords and falcons, though I can see crafters lists that consist of mostly t7/8 models and able to make marked for death and BB very difficult possibly being “too good” with the marine nerf.

    • Rawne Taff February 28, 2020 1:57 pm #

      BGH will deal with the vehicles just below 120 points

  5. masterstrider February 27, 2020 9:23 pm #

    This might be a typo, but it appears that the engineers secondary says in one section you need to have 2 units hold the same objectives to score a secondary point. But later it says if you hold 2 separate objectives, you can score 2pts. But there are only 2 engineer units total.

    “Starting from Battle Round 2, if one or more of these units starts and ends your turn within 3” of the **same objective marker** you control…” and then later is says, “If you have two Engineer units performing this role on **two separate objectives** and one or more of the objectives is outside of your deployment zone, earn 2pts.”

    It seems like it takes 2 units to hold 1 objective, but later you can hold 2 objectives with 2 units for 2 points.

    I might be reading that wrong, but I just thought I would bring it up.

    • Xenos Player February 27, 2020 10:41 pm #

      It’s start and end your turn within 3″ of the same objective, I think it’s to stop units with teleport abilities, high movement etc starting the turn on one objective and move to another and still getting engineers

  6. Daniel Micallef February 27, 2020 9:49 pm #

    Regarding Recon and Sappers secondary where it specifies objectives outside a deployment zone, do you mean just the actual objective marker must be out, or the marker and its 3″ aura/bubble? Cause it would be possible for a marker to be outside of the deployment zone, yet still able to grab it from within during deployment.

    • Reecius
      Reecius February 28, 2020 2:03 pm #

      Just the maker itself.

  7. Duz_ February 28, 2020 6:49 am #

    There was a time where not long ago when the community actually got to vote on itc changes

    Now those decisions are made behind closed doors
    Do TOs talk to every single participant at their events to able to speak for all players

    • Reecius
      Reecius February 28, 2020 2:04 pm #

      It’s too big now to do it the old way.

      The idea is that the TOs are your representatives. It’s vastly easier to get things done with a smaller group of just over 400 than a behemoth of 14,000+ people for 40k alone.

      Speak to your regional rep to express your ideas and concerns, or to your local TO. If they aren’t in the group currently, encourage them to join.

      • Agent x February 28, 2020 3:39 pm #

        Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.

        You can’t expect to wield supreme executive power just ’cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!

        Help help I’m being repressed!

        *sorry couldn’t resist

        • Reecius
          Reecius February 28, 2020 3:44 pm #

          lol, well played, sir!

        • Venkarel February 29, 2020 7:45 am #

          Look! There is some good mud over here.

  8. Will February 28, 2020 4:33 pm #

    The way it reads at the moment, you can stack big game hunter with other seek and destroy secondaries, provided you cause the killing blow with a different unit (or the same unit on a different turn).

    Is this intentional? Or does the phrase “by the same unit on the same target” need a little tweak?

    Eg. Unit one causes 20 wounds to a knight that is also a character and counts these for big game hunter, then unit 2 causes 4 wounds and kills it and counts the kill for headhunter.

    Thanks

    • Reecius
      Reecius February 28, 2020 10:04 pm #

      You cannot stack them in that way, no.

  9. Bridges February 29, 2020 8:45 am #

    Does this mean measurement of scoring objectives is no longer to the edge of the marker? I know this is/was the norm and it was written down, but it is not stated anywhere nor the size of a marker?

    Honestly, I just want to buy 6″ neoprene markers and use them for all rulesets. 😉

  10. Dragon_57 March 3, 2020 10:15 pm #

    For “The Reaper” don’t forget cavalry unit (chaos deamons or thousand sons have some of them).

Leave a Reply